Mitigating flow to surface risk
Managing MOP by area
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Celebrating 2025, a year of innovation
Oil and gas paradigm shifts this year
RTF: Most refused submission type in November
Leading indicators from industry
Astrobleme impacts deep well disposal scheme
Learn from the experience of other operators
Non-meridian thermal wells
Still drilling horizontal wells N‑S? Why?
Steam surfactant co-injection
Want to win? What is your competitive advantage?
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share