Life after polymer flood
But refused on a technicality
This applicant is giving up on a polymer flood returning it to water injection. Although their pilot technically worked it didn't meet their corporate hurdles. Unfortunately, due to a technicality, the AER refused to terminate their scheme requiring them to continue injecting polyacrylamide polymer.
Applications are closed for two reasons: technical and technicality. When the AER says, "Sorry, we don't believe you should inject here," they're closing your application on technical grounds. If you notified the wrong parties or don't have a pool designation correct, that's technicality.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. You can get these applications in moments by clicking the button below.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Closure, Polymer
Granger Low 20 Oct 2015
Supercharge 2026 with exploration AI skills that matter
Found a corner shot in thermal scheme
Don't blow the lid
Fracking into a neighboring well causes a blowout
Continuing Canadian thermal innovation doubled oil production
Experimental Propane Solvent co-injection in thermal
Shale in SAGD
How shale much is too much shale? Ask AppIntel AI.
Measuring the rate of oil and gas technology growth
Energy transition inside the oil industry
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share